Are All-on-4 Worth the Money? All-on-4 Implants vs Other Full-Arch Options

Are All-on-4 Worth the Money? All-on-4 Implants vs Other Full-Arch Options By Dr. Jon ( Junyi ) Ho | June 11, 2025

Facing multiple tooth loss can be overwhelming, especially when treatment options involve a significant financial investment. Many patients wonder if advanced procedures offer real, lasting value. “Are All-on-4 worth the money?” is a question we hear often in this context. This guide offers an in-depth, evidence-based examination of the options and factors that influence your decision.

We’ll explore immediate treatment costs, long-term maintenance expenses, and how lifestyle or health conditions affect suitability. Alternative full-arch options will be compared with the All-on-4 approach to highlight benefits and limitations. We’ll also discuss clinical outcomes, success rates, and what patients can expect over time. This article equips you with the knowledge to ask the right questions during your dental consultation.

Summary of the Content:

  • Full-arch dental treatments may restore multiple missing teeth using implant-supported or removable options tailored to individual clinical needs.
  • A dental professional must assess oral health, bone structure, and lifestyle to determine the most suitable treatment approach.
  • All-on-4 uses four strategically angled implants to anchor a full-arch prosthesis that is securely attached.
  • This treatment may be suitable for patients with reduced bone volume who prefer fewer surgical steps and a faster recovery.
  • Each has unique advantages and limitations, depending on bone quality, patient goals, and treatment complexity.
  • Cost considerations include surgical fees, materials, laboratory work, and long-term maintenance over a 10-15 year period.
  • Some options have higher upfront costs but may offer improved stability, aesthetics, and durability over time.
  • Successful outcomes depend on maintaining good oral hygiene, attending regular dental appointments, and having realistic patient expectations.
  • A personalised clinical assessment is essential for choosing a safe, effective, and long-lasting treatment option.

Full-Arch Dental Treatments: An Overview

Full-arch dental treatments address complex tooth loss, offering options tailored to each patient’s individual clinical needs and lifestyle. Each option differs in technique, timeline, and cost, requiring a thorough professional assessment. This section outlines key differences to help you prepare informed questions during your dental consultation.

What is All-on-4?

The All-on-4 uses four implants to anchor a full arch of prosthetic teeth in the upper or lower jaw. This approach may be suitable for patients with significant tooth loss resulting from advanced dental issues, like gum disease. Dentists assess oral function and health before recommending this treatment, as suitability varies between individuals. Here’s how the All-on-4 system works and what patients can expect:

  • The All-on-4 procedure places four dental implants in the jawbone to anchor a full arch of replacement teeth. Two implants are positioned vertically at the front, while two are angled at the back to utilise available bone effectively.
  • These implants serve as stable foundations for a full arch prosthesis, anchoring either a bridge or a denture (replacement teeth).
  • Treatment begins with a consultation that includes scans to assess bone structure and oral health. Dentists also review your medical history to determine if All-on-4 is a clinically appropriate option for your situation.
  • If suitable, surgery may follow, during which implants are placed under local anaesthesia or sedation.
  • In some cases, a temporary prosthesis may be placed on the same day as surgery, called immediate loading. This depends on the implant’s stability and the patient’s overall health, which a dental professional must assess.
  • The healing period typically lasts three to six months, during which the implants gradually integrate with the surrounding bone. Once integration is confirmed, the dentist fabricates and fits the final prosthesis based on the patient’s treatment plan.
  • Patients considered for All-on-4 treatment need adequate bone in the front jaw and be in good general health. They must also commit to maintaining consistent oral hygiene to sustain long-term implant stability and gum health.
  • A qualified dental professional must develop a personalised treatment plan based on each patient’s clinical needs and oral health status. Not all patients are suitable for All-on-4 treatment; alternative full-arch options may offer more suitable outcomes.


All-on-4 may offer a full-arch restoration option for suitable patients based on individual oral health and bone structure. Treatment outcomes and timelines differ, as each case requires personalised assessment by a qualified dental professional.

Alternative Full-Arch Options

When considering full-arch tooth replacement, several treatment options are available aside from the All-on-4 approach. Each option offers specific clinical benefits that may suit individual patient needs, taking into account bone health and lifestyle factors. Below are common full-arch alternatives that dentists may recommend depending on long-term goals and individual clinical circumstances.

  • Traditional Implant-Supported Bridges (six to eight implants):
    This treatment involves placing six to eight dental implants to anchor a bridge of prosthetic teeth. It often requires a longer treatment timeline, including healing periods between stages. This approach may be appropriate for patients with sufficient bone density and those seeking individualised implant anchoring across the arch.
  • All-on-6 Dental Implants:
    The All-on-6 treatment is similar to All-on-4 but uses six implants per arch for enhanced stability. The All-on-6 treatment follows a multi-stage process that involves implant placement, healing, and the final attachment of prosthetics. Dentists may recommend this option for patients with moderate bone volume, as determined by clinical assessment. Like other implant treatments, individual suitability must be assessed clinically.
  • Implant-Supported Removable Dentures:
    This option uses two or more implants with attachments that secure a removable denture in place. It provides more stability than traditional dentures, while allowing for easy removal and cleaning. This may be appropriate for patients seeking a balance between affordability, retention, and function.
  • Dental Bridges with Conventional Implants:
    These bridges are anchored by multiple individual implants and are designed to mimic the look and function of natural teeth. Treatment involves longer planning and healing stages and may require bone grafting. This option might be suitable for patients seeking a segmented, stable restoration that closely resembles natural dentition.
  • Conventional Removable Dentures:
    As a non-implant alternative, removable dentures rest on the gums and are held in place by suction or adhesives. They have a shorter treatment timeline and lower upfront cost, but may require periodic adjustments. This option may be suitable for patients who are not eligible for dental implant surgery or prefer a non-invasive approach.
    Each patient’s oral health is unique, so no single full-arch treatment is suitable for everyone. A dentist must assess suitability.


Traditional Full-Mouth Dental Implants vs All-on-4 Dental Implants

Traditional full-mouth dental implants require six to eight implants per arch to anchor individual crowns or bridges. This approach may offer stability by distributing the load evenly across the arch. It can suit patients with adequate bone density who want the feel of individual tooth replacements. However, it involves more extensive surgery, a longer treatment timeline, and often higher initial costs.

The All-on-4 treatment utilises four strategically placed implants to anchor a full-arch prosthesis, often with fewer surgical steps. It is suitable for patients with reduced bone volume who may not require or want grafting procedures. This approach can shorten treatment time and may reduce recovery periods in suitable cases. However, it may not offer the same level of customisation as traditional implant-supported options.

Comprehensive Cost Analysis

Darch Dental Centre

Are All-on-4 worth the money? That question often arises when patients compare full-arch dental treatment options. Choosing full-arch dental treatment involves more than just the initial price—it’s about long-term value and care planning. Each treatment option carries different costs based on complexity, materials, and follow-up requirements. This section breaks down those variables to help you confidently plan the right dental investment for your long-term needs.

Initial Treatment Costs

Understanding the initial treatment costs for full-arch dental options can help you better plan for your oral health journey. Prices vary depending on your clinical needs, but here is a general overview of typical treatment cost ranges:

  • All-on-4 dental implants typically cost between $21,000 and $35,000 per arch, depending on individual treatment requirements and materials. Costs may increase if procedures like immediate loading or high-quality prosthetic materials are included in your personalised treatment plan.
  • Generally, the entire treatment process for implant-supported removable dentures starts at $5,000. These may use fewer implants but include ongoing maintenance costs.
  • Conventional full dentures are usually the most affordable option for replacing all teeth in one arch. They typically cost between $800 and $2,000 per arch, depending on materials, customisation, and clinical requirements. A full set of upper and lower dentures may cost up to $3,500, depending on materials and fabrication quality. The final price also varies based on denture fit and any additional adjustments required for comfort and function.


Please note that these prices are approximate and should not be considered as quotes. The exact cost of treatment can only be determined after a comprehensive assessment by a qualified dental professional. Many dental clinics offer payment plans or financing options to help make treatment more manageable. Your dentist can discuss these options with you during your consultation.

Understanding Dental Implant Costs

Understanding the cost of dental implants can help patients evaluate their options thoroughly and plan for treatment with confidence. Below is a clear breakdown of what contributes to the overall cost and why these factors can vary:

  • Surgical fees:
    The surgical fee covers the placement of implants, including the clinician’s time, surgical staff, and the use of the facility. It also includes sterilisation protocols to maintain a safe environment and reduce the risk of infection during the procedure.
  • Material:
    Clinicians insert titanium or zirconia implant fixtures into the jawbone, which are manufactured to precise industry specifications. Their cost reflects the material quality, biocompatibility, and the reputation of the implant system manufacturer.
  • Abutments and prosthetics:
    Abutments connect the dental implants to the visible teeth, such as crowns, bridges, or full-arch prosthetic restorations. Dental prosthetics are custom-designed for each patient and made from durable materials to provide strength and functionality.
  • Laboratory fees:
    Dental laboratories design and fabricate the prosthetic components, using 3D imaging, CAD/CAM technology, and skilled technicians. These services are included in the overall cost and may vary depending on the material and design complexity.
  • Number of implants required:
    Some full-arch options use as few as four implants, while others may require six or more. The number of implants required directly influences the total treatment cost, as each additional implant adds materials and surgical time.
  • Complexity of the case:
    Cases that involve bone grafting or sinus lifts require additional planning and procedures prior to implant placement. These additional steps may result in increased treatment fees.
  • Geographic location:
    Costs can vary based on clinic location, reflecting differences in operational costs and regional market factors.
  • Per-implant vs. package pricing:
    Some practices charge per implant and component, while others offer bundled pricing for full-arch treatments. It’s important to ask whether follow-up visits, temporary teeth, or adjustments are included.


Consider both the initial cost of dental implants and the long-term value they can provide. Choosing a well-planned, high-quality implant treatment can help reduce the need for future adjustments and provide lasting function.

Long-Term Financial Considerations

When evaluating All-on-4 and other full-arch options, the long-term financial implications play an essential role in decision-making. Over 10–15 years, patients must budget for maintenance, occasional adjustments, and prosthetic replacements. All-on-4 often has a lower upfront cost; however, maintenance needs can vary based on the materials used and patient compliance. A per-year cost comparison helps clarify which option delivers better value over time.

Longevity depends heavily on oral hygiene, lifestyle habits, and regular dental reviews by a qualified professional. For example, smoking or inconsistent cleaning can reduce the lifespan of any implant-supported restoration. Patients who follow their dentist’s care plan often experience better long-term outcomes and fewer unexpected costs. Investing in quality care early may reduce the need for frequent interventions later.

Clinical Outcomes and Success Rates

Understanding treatment outcomes helps patients set realistic expectations and evaluate the long-term benefits. While implant survival is essential, success also encompasses comfort, aesthetics, and long-term function. This section examines real-world data, key risks, and variables that influence the success of full-arch implants.

All-on-4 Success Rates and Outcomes

Long-term studies report All-on-4 implant survival rates of approximately 93% and treatment success around 91.7% over 10–18 years. These outcomes define “success” as implant survival, absence of peri-implant disease, and stable prosthetic function without major complications. Immediate function protocols show strong results when used in carefully selected cases with good bone density. Healing involves initial osseointegration, which occurs over a period of three to six months, followed by long-term monitoring and maintenance.

Importantly, implant survival doesn’t always equate to full treatment success, which encompasses aesthetics, comfort, and patient satisfaction. Common complications—such as prosthetic screw loosening or peri-implantitis—occur in a minority of cases and are usually manageable. Success depends heavily on maintaining good oral hygiene, being a non-smoker, having stable systemic health, and skilled surgical execution. A thorough dental assessment is essential to determine individual suitability and optimise long-term outcomes.

Alternative Options: Success Rates and Outcomes

Studies show conventional implant-supported restorations have a 10-year success rate of 96.4%, ranging from 91.5% to 99.4%. All-on-4 treatment protocols have demonstrated success rates of up to 93% in carefully selected patients, as reported in clinical studies. Factors like bone density, systemic health, and smoking status can influence implant integration and overall treatment longevity. Immediate loading protocols may enhance patient satisfaction, but they necessitate meticulous planning and precise surgical execution for long-term success.

Implant-supported removable dentures generally exhibit lower long-term stability compared to non-removable restorations, requiring more frequent maintenance. Dental bridges with six to eight implants may offer enhanced load distribution, especially in patients with high bite forces. Regardless of approach, patients must attend regular hygiene appointments and follow home-care instructions to prevent complications. Success relies heavily on selecting the appropriate patient, adhering to follow-up care, and promptly managing prosthetic or biological issues.

Clinical Outcomes and Success Rates

Understanding treatment outcomes helps patients set realistic expectations and evaluate the long-term benefits. While implant survival is essential, success also encompasses comfort, aesthetics, and long-term function. This section examines real-world data, key risks, and variables that influence the success of full-arch implants.

All-on-4 Success Rates and Outcomes

Long-term studies report All-on-4 implant survival rates of approximately 93% and treatment success around 91.7% over 10–18 years. These outcomes define “success” as implant survival, absence of peri-implant disease, and stable prosthetic function without major complications. Immediate function protocols show strong results when used in carefully selected cases with good bone density. Healing involves initial osseointegration, which occurs over a period of three to six months, followed by long-term monitoring and maintenance.

Importantly, implant survival doesn’t always equate to full treatment success, which encompasses aesthetics, comfort, and patient satisfaction. Common complications—such as prosthetic screw loosening or peri-implantitis—occur in a minority of cases and are usually manageable. Success depends heavily on maintaining good oral hygiene, being a non-smoker, having stable systemic health, and skilled surgical execution. A thorough dental assessment is essential to determine individual suitability and optimise long-term outcomes.

Alternative Options: Success Rates and Outcomes

Studies show conventional implant-supported restorations have a 10-year success rate of 96.4%, ranging from 91.5% to 99.4%. All-on-4 treatment protocols have demonstrated success rates of up to 93% in carefully selected patients, as reported in clinical studies. Factors like bone density, systemic health, and smoking status can influence implant integration and overall treatment longevity. Immediate loading protocols may enhance patient satisfaction, but they necessitate meticulous planning and precise surgical execution for long-term success.

Implant-supported removable dentures generally exhibit lower long-term stability compared to non-removable restorations, requiring more frequent maintenance. Dental bridges with six to eight implants may offer enhanced load distribution, especially in patients with high bite forces. Regardless of approach, patients must attend regular hygiene appointments and follow home-care instructions to prevent complications. Success relies heavily on selecting the appropriate patient, adhering to follow-up care, and promptly managing prosthetic or biological issues.

Patient-Specific Factors in Treatment Selection

Choosing the right full-arch treatment depends on more than cost—it hinges on your unique clinical needs and lifestyle. Factors such as oral anatomy, hygiene habits, and healing timelines can all impact your long-term satisfaction. This section helps you understand how personalised evaluations guide safe, effective treatment planning.

Bone Density and Anatomy Considerations

Understanding your bone density and jaw anatomy is essential in selecting the right full-arch dental treatment. Each individual’s oral structure affects which procedures are feasible and how predictable the outcomes may be. Below are the key anatomical and structural factors that influence treatment planning and implant suitability:

Bone Quantity Influences Implant Viability: Adequate bone volume is necessary to stabilise implants, and insufficient bone may limit which treatments are possible without additional procedures.

  • Bone Quality Affects Long-Term Success:
    Denser bone offers better initial stability for implants, which can influence whether immediate loading (such as with All-on-4) is achievable.
  • All-on-4 Maximises Existing Bone Through Tilted Implants:
    All-on-4 treatments use angled implants to avoid anatomical structures such as sinuses and nerve canals. This approach engages denser anterior bone and may reduce the need for bone grafting in suitable patients.
  • Traditional Implants May Require Bone Grafting:
    Full-arch treatments with six to eight implants usually need more bone volume for support. Dentists may recommend grafts or sinus lifts.
  • Severe Bone Loss May Limit the Suitability of All-on-4:
    In cases of resorption or compromised anatomy, the All-on-4 treatment may not provide sufficient stability or long-term predictability.
  • Anatomical Structures Can Complicate Implant Placement:
    Anatomical features, such as proximity to sinuses, nerve canals, or thin ridges, can complicate the placement of implants. Dentists may recommend alternative options if these anatomical factors limit the safety of implant placement.
  • Alternative Options Exist for Complex Cases:
    When standard implants are not suitable, dentists may explore alternatives, such as zygomatic implants or implant-retained overdentures. Bone grafting with delayed implant placement may also be an option, depending on the individual’s anatomy and clinical needs.
  • Advanced Imaging Is Essential for Accurate Planning:
    Clinicians use cone-beam CT scans to assess bone structure and anatomy with a high level of precision. This detailed imaging helps plan dental implant treatments more safely and customise them to each patient’s specific needs.
  • Individualised Assessment Determines Most Suitable Approach:
    Only a comprehensive clinical evaluation by a qualified dental professional can determine the most appropriate implant option for each patient.


Bone structure and anatomical considerations are key factors in determining whether to choose All-on-4 or other full-arch implant treatments. A personalised, evidence-based assessment is essential to achieving the most appropriate and sustainable outcome.

Lifestyle and Maintenance Factors

When selecting a full-arch restoration, consider how daily habits and hygiene routines may vary between treatment types. Different restoration options may also require specific dietary adjustments and long-term maintenance commitments. Below is a detailed comparison to help you understand what each option might involve:

  • Implant-supported options, such as All-on-4, require thorough daily cleaning around the prosthesis and implant sites to maintain optimal health. Use floss threaders, interdental brushes, or a water flosser for effective hygiene. Unlike natural teeth, these prosthetics need thorough hygiene to prevent inflammation and peri-implant disease.
  • Patients must remove removable implant-supported or conventional full dentures daily for thorough cleaning and overnight soaking. These options may be easier to maintain but require careful handling and consistent hygiene to prevent irritation or odour. Improper care can lead to odour, staining, or tissue irritation.
  • Patients may need to follow a soft-food diet after implant placement to reduce pressure on the healing implants. This dietary adjustment promotes proper healing and helps protect the stability of the newly placed dental implants. In contrast, removable dentures may be adjusted more easily to accommodate dietary needs in the short term.
  • Patients with prostheses often experience improved chewing function and speech clarity compared to traditional removable dentures. Both options require dietary awareness to avoid excessive pressure or damage to the prosthetic components. Tough or sticky foods should still be approached with caution.
  • All full-arch restorations require professional maintenance, which involves dental visits every 6-12 months. These visits may include professional cleaning, screw-tightening, replacement of denture linings, or periodic assessment of implant stability.
  • Maintenance costs over time can vary. Implant-supported options may involve higher initial and maintenance costs due to potential component replacements or adjustments over time. Removable dentures may require more frequent relining or replacement due to changes in gum tissue or wear and tear.
  • Patient commitment plays an important role in the long-term success of any full-arch treatment. Effective daily hygiene and regular professional care have a significant impact on the duration and effectiveness of the restoration.


Understanding these differences can help you choose a treatment approach that aligns with your lifestyle and commitment to ongoing care. Your dental professional will guide you through personalised recommendations during your consultation.

Treatment Timeline Considerations

Treatment timelines for full-arch implants vary depending on the clinical method, healing rate, and any preparatory procedures required. Understanding these factors helps patients evaluate their options clearly and set realistic expectations for their dental implant journey. Here’s how these elements can affect the duration of your treatment:

  • Immediate Loading (Same-Day Teeth):
    Some All-on-4 treatments allow for a temporary prosthesis to be placed on the same day as surgery. This is only possible when implants achieve high initial stability and the patient has adequate bone density and overall health.
  • Delayed Loading (Traditional Approach):
    Conventional implant treatments often require a healing period of three to six months before attaching the final restoration. This allows for osseointegration, where the implant fuses securely with the jawbone.
  • Impact of Preparatory Procedures:
    Additional treatments such as extractions, bone grafting, or managing gum disease can significantly extend the timeline. These procedures are often essential for creating a stable and healthy environment for implants.
  • Variation in Healing Rates:
    Healing timelines vary between patients due to factors such as age, medical history, bone quality, and smoking habits. A tailored approach helps guide each stage to be completed at the right time, facilitating long-term success.
  • Risks of Rushed Timelines:
    Compressing the treatment schedule to meet arbitrary deadlines can jeopardise implant stability and long-term success. Healing and integration cannot be safely accelerated beyond what the body allows.
  • Why Long-Term Outcomes Matter Most:
    Although faster options may seem attractive, the primary focus should remain on achieving a durable, functional, and aesthetically pleasing result. Taking the appropriate time leads to a more predictable and lasting outcome.


Treatment planning should always be individualised, balancing your goals with clinical safety. By allowing time for proper healing, you promote the long-term success and comfort of your new smile.

Evaluating Your Full-Arch Options

Choosing a full-arch dental treatment is a significant health decision that involves more than just cost. It’s essential to gather reliable information, clarify expectations, and understand your options. This section facilitates thorough discussions with your dental team, allowing you to plan your next steps with confidence.

Questions to Ask Your Dental Team

When considering dental treatment—especially for complex or costly procedures—it’s important to feel informed, confident, and comfortable with your care plan. Here are specific, evidence-based questions patients should consider asking their dental team during a consultation.

Questions About Your Dental Practitioner and Clinic

  • What qualifications and experience do you have with this specific procedure?
  • Will you be performing the dental implant procedure yourself, or will someone else in your team be involved?
  • Do you regularly manage patients with similar dental conditions?


Questions About the Proposed Treatment

  • What are the different treatment options available for my condition?
  • Why do you recommend this particular treatment for me?
  • What are the benefits, risks, and complications of this procedure?
  • What materials or technologies will you use?
  • Is this a temporary or long-term option?


Questions About the Procedure and Recovery

  • What should I expect during the procedure?
  • Will I need anaesthesia or sedation, and what are the risks involved?
  • How long is the expected recovery time, and are there any activity restrictions?
  • Will I need to take time off work or arrange assistance at home?
  • What signs should I look out for that indicate something might be wrong after treatment?


Questions About Costs and Payment

  • What is the total estimated cost of this treatment?
  • What factors could cause the cost to increase during the process?
  • Are there any consultation, lab, or follow-up fees I should be aware of?
  • What payment plans or finance options are available?
  • Do you provide written treatment plans with itemised costs?


Questions About What Happens If Something Goes Wrong

  • What should I do if I experience pain, discomfort, or unexpected results after the treatment?
  • Who should I contact for urgent issues, especially outside of business hours?
  • Are any necessary adjustments, revisions, or follow-up treatments included in the cost?


Supporting Informed Decisions

  • May I have some time to consider my options before making a decision?
  • Is it appropriate to seek a second opinion for this type of treatment?
  • Do you provide written information that I can review at home?
  • Can you provide me with case examples of similar treatments before and after (without breaching patient confidentiality)?


Asking thoughtful, specific questions helps you feel confident and well-informed about your dental care choices. Your dental team should take the time to answer your questions and thoroughly explain your treatment options to you. They should also guide you in understanding the benefits, risks, and steps involved in your proposed dental care plan.

What to Look for in a Dental Clinic

Choosing the right clinic for full-arch treatment is a significant step that requires more than just a quick online search. Below is a practical guide to help you assess whether a dental clinic meets the standards for high-quality, patient-centred care:

  • Verify Professional Credentials:
    Confirm that the dentist is registered with AHPRA and has received specific training or has relevant experience in implant dentistry. This demonstrates that they comply with national standards of education, ethics, and competence.
  • Assess Clinical Experience:
    Select a clinic with a proven track record of experience in full-arch procedures. Dentists who routinely perform implant cases are more likely to anticipate challenges and tailor treatment to your needs.
  • Check for Advanced Technology:
    Look for clinics equipped with 3D imaging, digital scanners, and guided surgery systems. These technologies contribute to more accurate diagnostics and personalised treatment planning.
  • Evaluate the Consultation Process:
    A comprehensive consultation should include a detailed oral examination and a full review of your medical history. Your dentist should also discuss your treatment goals and explain all available options tailored to your needs. Clinics should offer multiple options, rather than a one-size-fits-all approach.
  • Demand Transparent Treatment Planning:
    Reputable clinics will provide a written treatment plan that clearly and comprehensively outlines the procedures, phases, costs, risks, and alternatives. This plan should reflect your clinical condition and preferences.
  • Prioritise Clear Communication:
    Choose providers who explain procedures in everyday language and actively encourage questions. Effective communication fosters trust and enables you to understand your treatment options.
  • Patient Education:
    A dental clinic will provide diagrams, models, or other visual aids to help you understand your treatment. They will also offer care and guidance before, during, and after your procedure.


Choosing a clinic for full-arch treatment should never be rushed. Take your time to compare dental providers and ask questions that help you feel confident in their clinical approach. Make your decision based on quality care and evidence-based practices—not just convenience, speed, or advertised pricing.

Final Thoughts

When considering full-arch dental options, patients should prioritise personal needs, oral health status, and lifestyle habits over generalised comparisons. Treatments such as All-on-4, dentures, or traditional implants differ significantly depending on the clinical presentation and bone structure. Patients often ask, “Are All-on-4 worth the money?”—the answer truly depends on their long-term oral goals and budget. A tailored clinical assessment is essential for selecting the most suitable option that aligns with individual expectations and needs.

At Darch Dental Centre, our QIP-accredited team offers over 16 years of combined experience in implant and restorative dentistry. We provide personalised consultations to help patients understand their options, without pressure or one-size-fits-all advice. “With flexible payment plans like Fund My Dental, Afterpay, and health fund assistance, we make quality care accessible. Book a consultation today to receive honest, evidence-based guidance tailored to your dental needs.

Dr. Jon ( Junyi ) Ho

Dr. Jon is a Perth-based dentist who graduated with a Bachelor of Dental Science in 2005 from the University of Western Australia. He has worked at a range of dental practices, including being a partner and principal dentist for a group of five dental surgeries in Sydney. Dr. Jon has been practising for over a decade in the northern suburbs of Perth. He provides treatment for patients in Darch, Madeley, Landsdale, Kingsway, Kingsley, Marangaroo, Alexander Heights, Wangara, Ellenbrook, and others.

Related Blogs

What Happens if an All-on-4 Implant Fails?

All-on-4 dental implants are a reliable treatment option for replacing an entire arch of missing teeth using just four strategically placed implants. They are widely used in clinical practice and have demonstrated high success rates when supported by good planning and patient compliance. However, like all surgical procedures, they carry...

What Are the Disadvantages of All-on-4 Dental Implants? Pros and Cons Explained

All-on-Four dental implants are a popular treatment option for patients who have lost multiple teeth or require full-arch rehabilitation. This procedure uses four strategically placed implants to support a dental prosthesis. It is often chosen as an alternative to traditional dentures due to its stability and function. However, not all...

What Is the Downside of All-on-Four Dental Implants?

All-on-Four dental implants are a popular treatment option for patients who have lost multiple teeth or require full-arch rehabilitation. This procedure uses four strategically placed implants to support a dental prosthesis. It is often chosen as an alternative to traditional dentures due to its stability and function. However, not all...